This bhadralok, goes the argument, is in direct battle with the cute people who stay in Bengal’s villages and vote for Trinamool Congress (TMC) and can now vote for BJP. These imagined communities of bucolic Bengal supposedly revile literature, haven’t heard of Satyajit Ray and, in contrast to the good-for-nothing, head-in-the-clouds bhadralok, are non-judgmental of their ‘inarticulate’ rural brethren. Individuals from such legendary villages apparently wait in hordes to show city-slicker liberals who bask in ‘hobbies’ like secularism a lesson.
In fact, these two areas of the cosmopolitan and rural are unbelievable (adjective of ‘fantasy’). However this narrative has not been conjured out of skinny air. It has its base within the receding significance of ‘intellectuals’, recognized as leaders of the bhadralok class, within the politics of West Bengal.
The final time public ‘intellectuals’ had an affect on state elections was in 2009, after the 2008 violence in Singur, Hooghly district, over the land acquisition for a proposed Tata Nano manufacturing unit subsequently pushed out by the-then in opposition TMC, and the violence in 2007 in Nandigram, East Midnapore, over land acquisition for the Left Entrance’s plan to arrange a particular financial zone (SEZ). Submit-2011, the ‘intellectually inclined’ have maintained a distance from TMC authorities ideology, even once they have been its beneficiaries. Now BJP state president Dilip Ghosh has been prolific about his distaste for ‘intellectuals,’ calling them ‘cowards and opportunists’.
However lament and pleasure over ‘misplaced greatness’ nonetheless holds the general public creativeness — a loss that many ascribe to some conspiracy – in addition to political cache, grouses making for an incredible electoral software. So, for BJP’s central management to hark on the Bengali’s siesta dream to ‘Make Bengal Nice Once more’ appears logical. Whereas House Minister Amit Shah’s promise to the individuals this weekend was a return to ‘sonar Bangla’ (golden Bengal) beneath BJP rule, the central management retains speaking concerning the state’s previous glory and current destroy beneath TMC rule.
There stays, nonetheless, one thorny facet in travelling again to Bengal’s ‘superb previous’ — you can not talk about it with out speaking about its ‘intellectuals’. On this, BJP has taken a leaf out of TMC’s playbook. It’s now gushing about Rabindranath Tagore. It’s being respectful of social reformer-scholar Ishwar Chandra Vidyasagar, whose bust was ‘mysteriously’ destroyed throughout Amit Shah’s Might 2019 Lok Sabha elections marketing campaign rally in Kolkata. It even made ill-advised makes an attempt to make use of Ritwik Ghatak’s cinema on partition to garner assist for the Citizenship (Modification) Act, earlier than being rebuffed by Ghatak’s relations.
However BJP has bungled alongside the best way. Vidyasagar has been attributed as the author of the incorrect kids’s textbook. The most recent goof-up by Shah about Tagore’s birthplace hasn’t helped. These could appear pointless trivia that bear no relevance to the ‘bigger scheme of issues,’ however Bengalis love trivia and flogging those that get it incorrect, Mamata Banerjee included.
For BJP, delving an excessive amount of into ‘cultural pleasure’ could have uncovered its quickie ‘election points-gathering’ abilities. What the occasion could not have realised is that the pursuit of ‘mental’ cache for appropriation is a excessive funding proposition with little to achieve, however a lot to lose if performed shoddily. As a substitute, BJP might do higher by being silent and taking the low(forehead) highway of growth, and so forth avoiding the ‘cultural greatness’ path.
In 2019, there was controversy over a video of college college students in a Kolkata campus dancing to a parody of a Tagore’s tune replete with cuss phrases. At the moment, there have been individuals who demanded that penal motion — and even violent motion – be taken in opposition to these ‘louts’. I had requested one such outraged individual which a part of Tagore’s philosophy condoned the violence he demanded in opposition to the kids. He had replied that he didn’t take care of philosophy ‘like losers’ however wouldn’t tolerate an ‘assault on Bengali pleasure’. He was consultant of a bigger image, which quickly transmuted right into a wave of violent threats on social media and police complaints in opposition to the scholars.
Social commentator Chandril Bhattacharya as soon as defined how regardless of the ever-present presence of Tagore in West Bengal, hardly any Bengali reads him past essentially the most elementary texts. The identical ‘hid apathy’ and impassioned lip-service holds for different icons. So, appropriating or co-opting icons shouldn’t be a reason for a lot concern for any occasion. However proactively messing issues up about them could also be a threat not definitely worth the ‘effort’.