To higher perceive variations between generations, together with how they understand each other and the largest challenges of the day, our workforce on the Coverage Institute at King’s Faculty London and New Scientist commissioned a survey of greater than 4000 folks aged 18 and over within the US and UK. Responses have been collected from 2 to 9 August.
Our earlier analysis has made clear that probably the most pervasive and damaging generational myths is that older cohorts don’t care concerning the surroundings or social function extra usually. Our new survey exhibits how dangerously caricatured that is.
In our examine, three-quarters of child boomers within the UK agree that local weather change, biodiversity loss and different environmental points are sufficiently big issues that they justify vital modifications to folks’s life, as excessive as some other technology (see chart). Seven in 10 of this group say they’re keen to make modifications to their very own life-style, fully in keeping with youthful generations.
Older generations are additionally much less fatalistic: just one in 5 child boomers say there isn’t any level in altering their behaviour to deal with local weather change as a result of it gained’t make any distinction, in contrast with a 3rd of Technology Z. This is a vital driver of how we act: a way that each one is already misplaced results in inertia.
However our examine exhibits that folks have a somewhat completely different impression of who thinks what: once we ask folks which age group is probably to say there’s no level in altering their behaviour, the oldest group is the probably to be picked out. We wrongly assume they’ve given up. Social psychologists name this false impression “pluralistic ignorance”. It is a vital impact, as a result of it shapes our views of others.
And older folks’s concern isn’t simply expressed with phrases, however mirrored of their actions. We know from different research that it’s truly child boomers and Technology X who’re the probably to have boycotted merchandise. However our new examine exhibits that additionally isn’t the notion. Nearly all of the public wrongly assume it’s Technology Z or millennials who are probably to boycott merchandise, and solely 8 per cent choose out child boomers and simply 9 per cent select Gen X.
It’s no shock that the general public have the incorrect impression. Countless articles and analyses paint the image of a clear generational break in environmental concern and motion, with a brand new cohort of younger folks coming by who will drive change, if solely older folks would cease blocking them. Time journal, for instance, known as Greta Thunberg “an avatar in a generational battle” when it made her its Individual of the Yr in 2019.
This isn’t simply incorrect, however harmful, because it dismisses the actual concern amongst massive proportions of our economically highly effective and rising older inhabitants.
The aftermath of the pandemic means it’s set to change into tougher, not simpler, to consider the long run, as short-term wants change into extra urgent: we are going to want all of the assist we are able to get, and creating or exaggerating generational division gained’t assist.
Extra on these matters: